Yahoo's awesome error message

February 13th, 2009

This morning I tried to sign up for a yahoo and flickr account. I hate signing up for new things these days. All the common login names that I use are often taken and so it takes me forever to find something that a) I will remember, and b) I consider appropriate. So after spending what seemed like ages search through possible logins, I found one that would work. I enter in the rest of my details including another email address to validate it against. I thought I was on the home run and was following the instructions of validating my alternative email address. I clicked the link, and stared in confusion and disblief as this error message appeared.

Just to clarify, the values in the both black boxes, are the same. So yahoo is telling me that I’m logged into the wrong account to validate the address against (despite the fact that I have only one account with them). Then they tell me to that I need to log out of account X and sign into account X. Well this surely has to be a “confussed.com” moment if ever there was one.

High Key Emily

February 12th, 2009
High key Emily

High key Emily

This is another edit for the photoshoot on Sunday with Emily. I’ve actually recropped this image from it’s 8×10 format, where Emily appears in the middle of the frame, so that she now appears off centre. I feel this gives the whole image more impact, added with the fact that Emily is positioned so that her body is facing out of the frame. Now some might complain that you should have positioned the subject in that position to start off with, but a trick I picked up from another website (who’s name I can’t remember at the moment) that suggested instead of worrying about composition you could opt for an alternative approach. This alternative approach is not to waste pixels on empty space such as the area to the left of Emily and instead fill the frame with the subject and then reposition afterwards in photoshop. Again the argument could be made about manipulation isn’t photography, but if you think about it you could do exactly the same in a dark room. Obviously this will only work under certain conditions, such as plain background like the one shown above.

PS. This thumbnail and the reduce image doesn’t do the image justice, at least thats my view.

Shoot with Emily

February 9th, 2009

On Sunday I had shoot lined up with Emily. Nothing seemed to go to plan on Sunday. I first arrived in plenty of time to setup as I hate running around in front of people trying to sort things out, but alas things took a lot longer than normal (guess I’m a little out of practice). Then as I was setting up and testing the lights one of the studio heads decided to do the unspeakable. First there was the fizzing sound followed by a series of pops and then suddenly the light went out and the unit emitted wisps of smoke from a series of vents. It was one of those moments when you’re ready to throw you hands into the air and cry. A short phone call to Nic who was also coming along and it was decided that we would still go ahead and see what could be done. I’m so glad that he suggested that, as I was ready to cancel but am so glad that I didn’t. Emily was great to work with, even with the slightly poor condition of my equipment (still cross at the studio head for doing that) she maintained a professional manner, following direction and moving into almost perfect poses on her own. I expect she will go far if she keeps that manner about her when working.

So despite one studio head doing the dirty on me, and some of the remote triggers I borrowed especially for the shoot not working correctly I managed to bag a number of images. Hopefully in the next couple of days before I head off to France I’ll be able to post the rest.

A card from my wife

February 6th, 2009
A card from my lovely wife

A card from my lovely wife

Above is a picture of the card I recieved last night from my lovely and lets face it amazing wife. Just for those that might be confused about what this might mean, all I’m going to say for the moment is the domain name of this site is incorrect for my new status.

Oh good god!

February 3rd, 2009

After much trouble with a company that I ordered a lens from, it finally turned up today. Now, before I purchased this lens I did review it and compared it against another lens that I was looking at. I even spoke to a couple of other photographers that use the lenses I was looking at and got information from them and went to a camera shop to try one of them out. In the end I went with the advice I had been given and opted for the lense that I hadn’t been able to hold. I had imagined it to be the same sort of size as the one that I did try, after all they did virtually the same sort of range. All I need to say now is I was wrong about the size, this thing is massive! No, really its big, to give you an idea I’ve taken a couple of pictures with it next to my Tamron 70 – 300mm lens. This thing is the same size but only does 24 – 70mm (see pictures below).

Top down view. Left is my zoom lens (70 – 300mm) and right is the new Canon lens (24 – 70mm)

Top view

Top view

Side view

Side view

Side view

I’m not even going to show the difference in the size of the lens hoods, it’s just rude!